| | Who's more mammoth? |  |
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Mike
King of The Dragons
Posts : 331
Join date : 2008-08-18
Age : 38
Location : Lloydminster, SK
|  Subject: Who's more mammoth?  Fri Feb 13, 2009 10:33 am | |
| The original Super Mario Bros? or the original Legend of Zelda? and why? discuss it. | |
|
| | |
Dukey
Ruler of Evil
Posts : 1477
Join date : 2008-08-16
Age : 36
Location : Regina, SK, Canada
| | Subject: Re: Who's more mammoth? Fri Feb 13, 2009 10:53 am | |
| er.. wha?.. Mammoth? I vote the 1st black Power Ranger. | |
|
| | |
Mike
King of The Dragons
Posts : 331
Join date : 2008-08-18
Age : 38
Location : Lloydminster, SK
| | Subject: Re: Who's more mammoth? Fri Feb 13, 2009 11:05 am | |
| - Dukey wrote:
- er.. wha?.. Mammoth? I vote the 1st black Power Ranger.
It means which is the bigger and better of the two... jagoff.. | |
|
| | |
Dukey
Ruler of Evil
Posts : 1477
Join date : 2008-08-16
Age : 36
Location : Regina, SK, Canada
| | Subject: Re: Who's more mammoth? Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:18 pm | |
| Ahh, probably Super Mario Bros because it was fun as shit and nobody had ever seen anything as big as it. Before that it was all like black background arcade rips on home console. | |
|
| | |
christenm123
Lasagna Lover
Posts : 64
Join date : 2008-11-26
Age : 36
Location : Prince Albert, Saskatchewan
| | Subject: Re: Who's more mammoth? Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:56 pm | |
| I say Super Mario Bros. The game basically single handidly saved the gaming industry. | |
|
| | |
BoboTheMonkey
The Red Comet!
Posts : 216
Join date : 2008-12-11
Age : 33
Location : Scotland
| | Subject: Re: Who's more mammoth? Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:52 am | |
| By original Mario, do you mean the sidescroller on the NES or the 2600 game?  | |
|
| | |
MrLongDonJohnson
T00 H@RDC0R3!!!
Posts : 113
Join date : 2008-08-24
Age : 36
Location : Unofficially homeless.
| | Subject: Re: Who's more mammoth? Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:59 pm | |
| Super mario becuz it was such a simple concept. Save your bitch! zelda has a similar concept but you gotta go find a bunch of keys and get a wicked ass sword and fuck people up. mario you just jumped on heads over the guy and hit the axe and he falls into lava. I'd say mario is more 'mammoth' becuz it was just easy to play and you can jump in and play. zelda you gotta go from start to end, mario you can just go over to friends and switch controllers no need for um..active thinking. | |
|
| | |
Dukey
Ruler of Evil
Posts : 1477
Join date : 2008-08-16
Age : 36
Location : Regina, SK, Canada
| | Subject: Re: Who's more mammoth? Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:34 am | |
| - BoboTheMonkey wrote:
- By original Mario, do you mean the sidescroller on the NES or the 2600 game?
There's only one Super Mario Bros. The game you're thinking of is probably Mario Bros and I didn't know it was on the 2600 i thought it was just in arcades and on the NES. | |
|
| | |
BoboTheMonkey
The Red Comet!
Posts : 216
Join date : 2008-12-11
Age : 33
Location : Scotland
| |
| | |
Dukey
Ruler of Evil
Posts : 1477
Join date : 2008-08-16
Age : 36
Location : Regina, SK, Canada
| |
| | |
mr.n1nt3nd0
YEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!!!
Posts : 817
Join date : 2009-02-24
Age : 29
Location : Cape Breton, NS, Canada
| | Subject: Re: Who's more mammoth? Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:59 pm | |
| super mario bros. because it revolutionized gaming way more than zelda did and super mario bros. 3 is a super mario bros. game and not a zelda game. | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Who's more mammoth? | |
| |
|
| | |
| | Who's more mammoth? | |
|
